Discussion:
Free signalling simulator download
(too old to reply)
Mike Smith
2003-12-26 00:31:53 UTC
Permalink
Looks interesting but I haven't tried it yet (a friend with broadband is
downloading it for me)

http://www.simsig.co.uk/


SimSig is a signalling simulation of Railtrack's Integrated Electronic
Control Centres (IECCs). It puts you in the signaller's chair and lets you
set the routes, deal with problems, etc.
It accurately simulates interlockings, specifically Solid State
Interlockings (SSIs), which is the main new interlocking technology in
Britain today. Even overlaps (never before seen on products already on the
market), swinging overlaps, approach locking, approach control,
time-of-operation point locking, shunt routes, warner routes, call-on
routes, they are all in SimSig!

The Train Describer (TD) is the only real way signalmen identify trains on
the screen (rather like flight numbers). So interposes, cancels, normal
steps, ripple steps, shuttle steps, are all in SimSig!

Of course, one of the real benefits of IECCs (and some NX panels too) is the
Automatic Routesetting System (ARS). This relieves the signaller of a lot of
his work. In SimSig a simple version of ARS is provided because YOU are the
one meant to be setting routes! The idea of ARS in SimSig is to let ARS do
the areas you are not interested in, leaving the interesting parts to
yourself. As a signalman at Ashford IECC once told me, 'we like to control
the major station areas but let ARS do the simple junctions'.

Between the ARS and the TD, they perform Automatic Code Insertion (ACI) when
a train reaches its destination. This is based on timetable information
(transmitted from the TimeTable Processor (TTP) in a real IECC). And, of
course, you can edit your own timetables right from within SimSig! The
timetable editor is built in and does not cost any extra.

Train motion is accurately simulated, using braking and acceleration
profiles, maximum speeds, differential line speeds, station stops, etc.
Trains can also be timetabled to join or divide, run-round, etc.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.524 / Virus Database: 321 - Release Date: 06/10/03
Hugo L.
2003-12-26 01:31:21 UTC
Permalink
Well, you said it all...It's the best...and it's FREEEEEEE

Thanks to Geoff Mayo & companions for this excellent simulation.

At this time, north london line IECC simultation is being completed and will
be the most complex of all


(Although i get angry with the freakin' habit of the network rail and it's
predecessors of making tracks unidirectional, even under IECC
control....(you do like to keep things complicated, don't you?)


Regards

Hugo
Post by Mike Smith
Looks interesting but I haven't tried it yet (a friend with broadband is
downloading it for me)
http://www.simsig.co.uk/
SimSig is a signalling simulation of Railtrack's Integrated Electronic
Control Centres (IECCs). It puts you in the signaller's chair and lets you
set the routes, deal with problems, etc.
It accurately simulates interlockings, specifically Solid State
Interlockings (SSIs), which is the main new interlocking technology in
Britain today. Even overlaps (never before seen on products already on the
market), swinging overlaps, approach locking, approach control,
time-of-operation point locking, shunt routes, warner routes, call-on
routes, they are all in SimSig!
The Train Describer (TD) is the only real way signalmen identify trains on
the screen (rather like flight numbers). So interposes, cancels, normal
steps, ripple steps, shuttle steps, are all in SimSig!
Of course, one of the real benefits of IECCs (and some NX panels too) is the
Automatic Routesetting System (ARS). This relieves the signaller of a lot of
his work. In SimSig a simple version of ARS is provided because YOU are the
one meant to be setting routes! The idea of ARS in SimSig is to let ARS do
the areas you are not interested in, leaving the interesting parts to
yourself. As a signalman at Ashford IECC once told me, 'we like to control
the major station areas but let ARS do the simple junctions'.
Between the ARS and the TD, they perform Automatic Code Insertion (ACI) when
a train reaches its destination. This is based on timetable information
(transmitted from the TimeTable Processor (TTP) in a real IECC). And, of
course, you can edit your own timetables right from within SimSig! The
timetable editor is built in and does not cost any extra.
Train motion is accurately simulated, using braking and acceleration
profiles, maximum speeds, differential line speeds, station stops, etc.
Trains can also be timetabled to join or divide, run-round, etc.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.524 / Virus Database: 321 - Release Date: 06/10/03
Ross
2003-12-26 22:41:38 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 01:31:21 -0000, "Hugo L."
<***@sapo (dot) pt> wrote in
<3feb9275$0$27605$***@news.telepac.pt>, seen in uk.railway:

[...]
Post by Hugo L.
(Although i get angry with the freakin' habit of the network rail and it's
predecessors of making tracks unidirectional, even under IECC
control....(you do like to keep things complicated, don't you?)
No. They like to keep them *cheap*, regardless of any other effects.


(Well, "cheap" in the sense of significantly cheaper than
bi-directional lines!)
--
Ross Hamilton, in Lincoln (UK)
From address *will* bounce

| New to uk.railway? Read the Frequently Asked Questions at
| the uk.railway FAQ site: <http://www.ukrailwayfaq.co.uk>
Hugo L.
2003-12-27 00:05:46 UTC
Permalink
The good old principle:

Save one now, spend 100 later.....

Around here it is granted that a double track has bi directional lines. It
is plain stupidity to think like that...What strikes me most is that high
traffic lines work also under this scheme.

The worst i came across around here, is the quadruple track strectch from
lisbon to sintra(up, up, down, down) , where the inner tracks are not bi
directional...when works where being done at a certain station (i was
Benfica, but then, how many on this list know where it is ;-) ), only the
two down tracks where available ....as the inner track was unidirectional,
the train going up, went on the right most track...so for one time we had
trains running on the right(Our regulations forbid that in a double track,
when a train is running in the wrong line, another one, comming in the
opposite direction runs in the other line...after all, trains do are suposed
to run on the left)

Regards

Hugo
Post by Ross
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 01:31:21 -0000, "Hugo L."
[...]
Post by Hugo L.
(Although i get angry with the freakin' habit of the network rail and it's
predecessors of making tracks unidirectional, even under IECC
control....(you do like to keep things complicated, don't you?)
No. They like to keep them *cheap*, regardless of any other effects.
(Well, "cheap" in the sense of significantly cheaper than
bi-directional lines!)
--
Ross Hamilton, in Lincoln (UK)
From address *will* bounce
| New to uk.railway? Read the Frequently Asked Questions at
| the uk.railway FAQ site: <http://www.ukrailwayfaq.co.uk>
Ross
2003-12-27 11:23:10 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 00:05:46 -0000, "Hugo L."
Post by Hugo L.
Save one now, spend 100 later.....
Yes.

Good old British accountancy-led operations.

<sigh>
--
Ross Hamilton, in Lincoln (UK)
From address *will* bounce

| New to uk.railway? Read the Frequently Asked Questions at
| the uk.railway FAQ site: <http://www.ukrailwayfaq.co.uk>
Ken Wheatley
2003-12-28 14:00:24 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 01:31:21 -0000, "Hugo L."
Post by Hugo L.
Well, you said it all...It's the best...and it's FREEEEEEE
Thanks to Geoff Mayo & companions for this excellent simulation.
At this time, north london line IECC simultation is being completed and will
be the most complex of all
(Although i get angry with the freakin' habit of the network rail and it's
predecessors of making tracks unidirectional, even under IECC
control....(you do like to keep things complicated, don't you?)
I live in WAGN (West Anglia) land, where they have just resignalled.
Of course the line is now very busy, with four Stansted Expresses now
added to the old mix of services to Cambridge and Hertford East.

So did they make the lines bidirectional? Well, sort of. It looks like
they have installed position light signals for wrong-way running.
Maybe a start, but not what we would have hoped for.

Loading...