Post by D7666Post by Roland PerryBut I thought the 2tph fast services would continue to terminate at
Kings Cross, and only the 1+1tph semi-fast and slows feed belong to the
Thameslink service.
Surely, because the pattern of linked services through Thameslink core
is still NOT finalised the non-TL servcies are also not fixed yet ?
You'd better tell that to the people at the DfT who issued the TSGN ITT
with a map of the through services with frequencies annotated.
Post by D7666TL core 16 TPH (peak) to Midland and 8 TPH (peak) to GN, and (IIRC) a
requirement to maintain minimum 4 TPH linked Bedford Brighton, is
fixed, but not much more ?
The ITT shows 2tph to Cambridge, which by wide agreement are the slow
and semi-fast services [but not including the fasts which emulate
semi-fasts in the rush hour].
Post by D7666Where the others go with what cross London linkage, and with what
stopping pattern is not finally decided, and AFAIK it is up to the
winning bidder of the combined TSGN franchise to determine.
It may be the case that the franchisee has to decide whether (eg)
Peterborough services go to Brighton, and Cambridge to Horsham [or vice
versa] but the franchise spec will have determined the stopping patterns
for London to Brighton/Horsham/Peterborough/Cambridge.
Post by D7666Hence, if they have not determined what the TL core services pattern of
stops outside the core is, they can't have finalised what the non TL
pattern to KX is since they are inexorably linked.
It appears to be in the ECML ITT (for GN), as pointed out by Ian Bidwell
in another thread.
--
Roland Perry