Post by Sam WilsonPost by tolly57http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2696396/17-injured-two-trains-in
cluding-high-speed-TGV-crash-south-west-France.html
Sound like a driver error to me on the part of the driver of the TER.
That a TGV is involved is irrelavent when the TGV is running on the
classic network.
There could of course have been a signalling error, but even with a
decaying network these are extremely rare.
A couple of photos at <http://www.thelocal.fr/20140717/tgv-cras-france>
and reports that faulty signalling may well have been involved. It maya
be based on a report in French at
<http://www.sudouest.fr/2014/07/17/denguin-64-collision-entre-un-tgv-et-u
n-ter-1618033-4344.php> with more photos, but I French isn't good enough
to skim it quickly and I don't have time for Google translate just now.
Apparently they were doing work on the signalling system.
http://www.sudouest.fr/2014/07/18/collision-ferroviaire-en-bearn-un-accident-du-a-un-feu-reste-rouge-1618843-4107.php
Here's my quick translation:
The signalling system of the track near Pau where a collisian between
two trains took place on Thursday caused 40 people to have injuries of
whom two are still in a bad state was being repaired. This was said by
the State Secretary of Transport Frédéric Cuvillier while announcing
revisions "across the network".
"You have to understand that the signalling system was being repaired.
It is impossible to rule out or confirm any causality between the
repairs and the accident" he stated to the press on Thursday. "The
repair works seem to have been disturbed and weren't succesful" he added
while talking to Europe 1 on Friday.
According to Alain Krakovitch, the Director General of SNCF, who was
standing next to the Secretary of State, the accident may have been
caused by a signal that was showing permanent red, necessitating the
stopping of all trains.
"When a signal keeps showing red, it is necessary to take action
immediately en slow down, which was done by the TGV but not the TER. Why
did this happen? What did the driver of the TER see? Why did he think he
could continue driving at normal speed while the TGV had slowed down?
That is something the inquest will have to tell us", he explained.
"This accident is unique, unheard of and exceptional" stated Frédéric
Cuvillier, when asked why the TGV "had run at reduced speed because of
the signalling and the TER that passed over the same track a couple of
minutes later had not."
"Was there a technical error, made worse by human error? Noone can tell.
The inquest, which was started immediately by BEATT, the independent
organisation, will have to give the answers, augmented by the inquest
done by SNCV as well as the judicial inquest", Frédéric Cuvillier added.
It was stressed that the accident was "very different to Brétigny"
(Essone), an accident that happened almost a year ago on July 12 2013
where 7 people lost their lives but where the track was not the cause of
the problem.